It was not that long ago that my husband pointed out a huge error in a caption on the front page of the New York Times. I was crestfallen. I had always thought of the Times as producing impeccable copy --and more often than not --excellent writing and reporting.
Anyone can make a mistake, but the New York Times has a long illustrious history of very, very few typos or misspellings in their publications.
Perhaps the Times is just echoing and mirroring what I seem to see everywhere, which is either a general misunderstanding of the meaning of a word or a lack of interest in checking to ensure the word is spelled correctly.
I've probably made 25 errors so far in this blog, but I'm not the Times. When I write for others, I spend a lot more time proofreading my work compared to this blog that is being written with a cup of coffee by my side.
I don't get excited if I make a mistake here, but when the Times gets lackadaisical about spelling I do get worried.
Ugh. I know this isn't comparable to the Times, but have you seen the nonsense that get's published in The Daily Mail? I don't know what rules of grammar they are following. I don't think they are even trying to double check prior to publishing.
ReplyDeleteI would love it if they'd hire proofreaders...I know two right now who could clean up that site and make it appear respectable!
ReplyDelete